There are definitely “three” types of vote. Of course sorting and categorization depends on the feature or quality by which you investigate a quantity of ideas, concepts or material items or entities. They may be sorted in different ways according to chosen defined features.
1) Secret vote:- In which the identity of the voter is supposed to be ultimate secret, by disconnecting and isolating the identity of the voter from his vote share count, for protecting the voter against sorts of pressures on his free will to vote. The setback point in this type is that there is no 100% procedure to grant honesty and clean vote result without rigging, which reduce the quality of the vote operation in total.
2) Open Vote:- In which the counter of vote shares is supposed to be most obvious open for ultimate honesty, by connecting the identity of the voter with his vote share count, for protecting the entire vote operation itself against rigging and cheating. The setback point in this type is that there is no 100% procedure or measures to grant no pressure sorts taking place against the voter will, which reduce the quality of the vote operation in total.
Which sort is better to apply? There is no “which sort is better to apply”. It is optimization evaluation in which the decision maker whoever he is or they are to weigh according to the circumstances of the vote operation the “danger factor” against the “honesty factor” and decide which one should be applied in each specific situation to reach most optimized results and then it is the most best possible. Unfortunately, the concept if “optimization” is not well comprehended outside the engineering field of practice. In so many situations in real world, there is no “ever best”, there is “optimization”. One of the two sorts will accomplish better optimization than the other for each specific application.
Whatever type of vote process and any degree in between; you should understand that there are two factors that work against each other. (a) The “Honest factor” which meant how far the vote technically is clean without rigging. (b) The “danger factor” which meant the practice of any coercive force and pressures to shut down the freedom of the voter. And you should technically optimize between these two main factors to get the maximum good quality from the vote process.
I love it when all governments allover the world pretend like idiots and ignorant, it is hilarious satire, they are mocking the ignorant public indeed. We will see how the humanity is idiot creatures. Idiocy pays money more than wisdom? It doesn’t when it comes to life decision.
In the so called parliaments as representative of the publics, where one member vote share counts for or represents hundreds of thousands or may be millions of individual vote shares, his vote share value is very expensive inside the parliament. The members in one parliament around the world are used to be somewhere between hundred and five hundreds, (a) they are very few, (b) they are subject to big danger matched to the value of the vote about the fate of the country. Any parliament member is subject to different pressures against his will or against the interest of the people he is representing, varying from bribery to threatening the life of his family and himself passing by staged scandals on the way, only they need to identify the member in connection with the vote inside the parliament, for they are few in number it is an easy task to manage by spies or local political organized crime. The danger factor is tremendous to eliminate any granted good vote quality in the parliament if not given serious care. Taken in consideration, that because the number is few contained in one place, it is very easy secure to set an honest vote without rigging in just few minutes through either sort, with such few number it is almost impossible to rig the vote either way, open vote or secret vote, it is equal. Honest vote that meant no rigging in is not a factor to care about here because it is very easy to manage either way; it is the “danger factor” is the determinant evaluation in this situation. So which one of the two vote sorts you think should be applied in the parliament? 0 with such very few number of voters the honest vote is secured with no problem, the secrecy of the identity of the voter to great extent will reduce the danger factor that may affect the will of the voter to vote for what he thinks is right. But it is not what happens around the world. To what I know and noticed the main and major method of voting inside the parliaments is the “open vote”, why is it going in contrary to the rationality and good will? The parliament is designed in this way such that let a backdoor to control all parliament vote results, the parliament no matter who the public will choose as representatives, the parliament is fake institution. Like it is not enough the representative democracy is already fake democracy on first place; no it is not enough; if any of the representatives of the public thought for a once to play otherwise outside the script lines, he can’t hide his attempt then he is dead way or another. Everything is fully under control, don’t think otherwise. And in the land of seductive bitch, yeah, yeah that very tall woman of dead stone and lighter in hand to torch the earth, and book record of murders on the other hand, perhaps the story of standard price list for selling the votes inside the parliament is just a rumor or conspiracy theory, but what is called influential and pressure groups and organizations to affect the vote inside the parliament is well known, man come on, some of them is officially registered. How that could be possible? It is possible because of the parliament open vote and by treating each member, one by one. And the American dollar is not American at all, imagine that! Some facts are stranger than any imagination in mind of the mentally blind. Government is organized crime.
Now in concern of the public votes, the number of voters is so huge such that the security of the single voter is no issue of worry to affect the vote quality in much negative way, no one will succeed to empty the sea or the river by cup so he will not try it. Yet such tremendous number of voters is a wide door on full open for dishonest vote operation by rigging and there ever lays the source of all worry and headache in public votes. Forget about picking some individual voter among thousands or millions and threatening his life to alter his free will, the worst thing to happen is bribing and it what happens on land of practical experience. First to consider is, bribing in case of the parliament member voter is a crime because his vote inside the parliament is not his own right or his own personal benefit for his vote is representative vote. Meanwhile the paying for the very individual street voter though it could be fatal wrong mistake he should not accept, still the basic fact is that his vote is his property and his right and he can do whatever he wants to do with it. In most cases the street voter will evaluate the gain which is more beneficial to himself and his society. For example, though it is simplistic limited example, there is a vote for increasing the social security budget, the briber should pay in total what is equal to or more than the cost of the increasing security budget itself, bribing here is meaningless, and even if less still the voter gained something certain better than nothing as probable compensation. In worst possibilities in concern of the danger factor, yet still it is contained within the control of the voter and his rights. So which one of the two vote sorts you think should be applied in the public vote process? It is direct obvious that the optimized option that should be applied for public vote is the “open vote”, with such huge number of voters the danger factor is almost null, and the open vote meant to eliminate or to reduce the rigging capability to minimum possibilities or meant to enhance the honesty factor, that is. But it is not what happens around the world. It is completely known that the only method of voting in the public votes is the “secrete vote”, why is it going in contrary to the rationality and good will? The public vote process intentionally is designed in this way such that let a backdoor to control all public vote results, if the political propaganda failed and polls or other means to probe the public opinions showed uncertain results hence the rigging is the solution through the backdoor, it is the exact same situation allover the world, the public vote as whole process is fake. Like it is not enough the representative democracy is already fake democracy on first place; no it is not enough; if any of the public street voters thought for a once to play otherwise outside the script lines, he will not hide his attempt in the various public opinion probes, then it is rigged way or another. Everything is fully under control, don’t think otherwise. Oh yeah and the seductive bitch will teach you the democracy or kill you, have fun. Some facts are stranger than any imagination in mind of the mentally blind. Government is organized crime.
Are you surprised that the Scotland independence vote, September 18, 2014, has been rigged? I wonder!
I wish this dirty treason of rigging the vote deepens the understanding of the meaning of independence concept and practice more than just plain separatism; is it not why and how William Wallace had been betrayed? North America one time with some few undisciplined revolutionaries under-equipped and poor they could gain their separatism from the strongest empire on earth that time; exactly on that same place today the United States of America with biggest, strong and most advanced army on earth is not able of the least to gain its independence. It is much more than that; ; ; and it neeeeeds more than that. Truth is independence. Revoke and try the vote again correctly; it is not over <wink>.
September 21, 2014